Journeys with Autism

Back in July, I underwent a two-hour audiology assessment. I got the full report in the mail last week, so I thought I’d share the results and how they lend themselves to self-advocacy. From a medical point of view, I have the following:

A mild hearing loss in my right ear
A moderate hearing loss in my left ear
Tinnitus
Auditory processing disorder

I hadn’t been aware of the hearing loss, so I wonder whether it’s really a “loss,” or whether I’ve always heard that way. I also wasn’t aware that the intermittent, high-pitched sound in my head was tinnitus; I’ve experienced that sound, on and off, all my life. Of course, the interesting auditory processing system I carry around was not news to me, although it was fun to have it show up in an audiology report instead of constantly having to convince people to take my word for it.

But that’s the medical point of view. From my internal point of view, the assessment showed me, in new and interesting ways, just how much I rely upon my visual sense to translate sound, and just how much I need to advocate for myself as a visual hearer.

The audiologist gave me several hearing tests, all of which took place in a sound-proof booth. (Heaven!) After I told her that my experience of sound is acute, she adjusted the volume for each test so that the sound would not be aversive. For the first test, in order to get a baseline for what I could actually hear, she simply gave me a series of words to repeat. Then, things got really interesting.

Binaural Interaction
The binaural interaction test measures word recognition in noise. The audiologist played a series of words spoken in the midst of noise—noise that I can only describe as a combination of static and the sound of an airplane flying somewhere in the vicinity of your house. Not fun. In my left ear, I could recognize 80% of the words, which rates somewhere in the middle of Good; in my right ear, I could recognize only 68%, which lies at the border of Poor. (Poor is below 68%.) What’s interesting to me is that I could distinguish sound better out of my left ear, in which I have less hearing, than in my right ear. It’s possible that hearing less allows me to filter out sound a little better. I’m not sure. At any rate, during the assessment, the only way for me to distinguish the words from the noise was to see them as spelled words and hold them in my memory. Each time, my repetition of the word was delayed because I had to work quickly past being overwhelmed, somehow fish the word out of the noise, hold it in my mind, look at it, and read it out loud.

Binaural Integration
The binaural integration test measures how well the subject can hear out of both ears simultaneously. The audiologist played a series of four numbers: two in one ear, and two in the other. I had to repeat the numbers to her. I got very anxious at the prospect of having to decode competing sounds, but I did surprisingly well on this test: 90% in my left ear and 92.5% in my right ear. However, the high scores are deceiving, because the process was not in the least intuitive. I kept my eyes closed, I listened very hard, I memorized what I heard, I visually lined up the images of the numbers in my mind’s eye, and then I spoke them. I did lots and lots of work, which resulted in lots and lots of delay. It’s a good thing I’ve developed lots and lots of patience.

Auditory Closure
The auditory closure test measures how well the subject can hear words spoken very quickly. Yikes. For most of the test, I was guessing. Sometimes, I simply couldn’t hear a thing; I’d just throw up my hands and shake my head. When all was (very quickly!) said and done, I scored 48% in my left ear and 52% in my right ear. On the overview from the audiologist, those numbers don’t even show up in the range of possible results. In the understatement of the year, the report notes that I am “presenting below normal limits in this area of processing.”

This test was very difficult because I couldn’t hear the words clearly enough to form a picture in my mind. I’m unable to hear soft consonant sounds like “p” or “th”; they’re at a frequency that my ears don’t pick up. (Later in the assessment, the audiologist ran a test that showed that the cilia in my left ear, which should be picking up these frequencies, are inactive. I believe she referred to them as “dead.”) Any sound at this frequency drops out at the end of a word. When words come at me slowly, I can usually run through the list of possible meanings in my mind’s eye, but when the words come at me quickly, the sense of the sound fading away is especially acute, and my ability to see the words in my mind breaks down. For instance, for the word stop, I was hearing sto-. For all I knew, the word could have been stop, stock, or stall. When I couldn’t see the word in my mind, I became very frustrated with the process, which probably accounts for why I become overwhelmed when people around me are talking too quickly.

Auditory Patterning
The auditory patterning test measures how well the subject can hear and replicate relative pitch. The audiologist played a series of three sounds, and asked me to tell her whether the pattern was “low-low-high,” “high-high-low,” and so on. I took this test twice. The first time, I used my hand to replicate each sound. If the pattern was “low-low-high,” I moved my hand twice on the same plane before moving it up once. By doing this, I was able to see the sound visually and give the answer. When the test was over, I told the audiologist about the method I’d used, and she said, “Okay. We’re going to do the test again. This time, sit on your hands!”

I tried not to panic. She played the sounds again. This time, I saw the sounds in my mind as colored dots: pink for low and red for high. Apparently, this is a form of synaesthesia, something I don’t remember having experienced before. Since I’ve long had synaesthesia-envy, this was very cool.

Using my visual strategies, I scored 100%, in each ear, on both tests. After all, ordering things into patterns will be the last of my faculties to go.

Recommendations for Self-Advocacy
The audiology report lists recommendations for how to walk through the world and self advocate with my way of hearing:

1. During communication, decrease background noise (such as scraping chairs, running water, fans, and talking).

2. If instructions or directions are given verbally, check in with the person providing them to make sure that I’ve understood what has been said, particularly if no written instructions are available.

3. Request written information to supplement any auditory information. For example, when making an appointment with a doctor, request a card with the date and time.

4. As often as possible, ask that others present information sequentially, especially if more than one person is providing the information. For example, instead of “Before you watch TV, can you walk the dog and take out the trash?” ask others to say, “Can you walk the dog, take out the trash, and then sit down to watch TV?”

5. Ask if I do not understand or if I have missed something. It is important to be as open as possible about communication so that when breakdowns occur, they do not result in anxiety, frustration, and anger.

6. Repeat what I have heard to clarify that I have understood. If I have heard part of the message but not the whole, I need to repeat the information I did hear while asking for clarification of the information I missed. For example, if someone says, “The elephant is sitting on the sofa in the livingroom,” and I heard the part about the elephant, I need to say, “The elephant is sitting where?” If I heard only the part about the sofa in the livingroom, I can say, “What did you say about the sofa in the livingroom?”

I find it a challenge to put these kinds of recommendations into play, but I am making progress. It’s really just a question of inertia. I’ve spent so many years covering up my difficulties and guessing at what people are saying that it’s an adjustment to switch to words like, “I don’t know. Could you clarify?” But it’s been an immense relief to find out that my difficulties are due to differences in the way I hear sound, rather than absent-mindedness, or lack of intelligence, or just plain not caring (all false explanations with which I’ve bludgeoned myself over the years). It’s not a question of attention, intelligence, or love. It’s that I hear sound visually. It’s a simple difference. It’s much easier to ask for help with a difference than with a moral failing. At least, it is for me.

It’s now clear why I’ve been a writer since I first learned to hold a pencil. I’ve spent most of my life struggling to decode sound and render it into words. It’s only in the past year and a half, since I’ve allowed myself to block my hearing, that I’ve realized that my pure visual sense is extremely acute. Because I now don’t need to decode sound constantly and to the exclusion of all else, I can notice what my other senses are doing. There are days in which I can’t even think about putting something into writing. I’m too involved with the pure fascination of the visual world and with rendering it in drawings, paintings, photographs, and other kinds of art.

But I’ll never lose my attachment to the written word. In the world of sound, it’s my anchor.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Over the past few months, I’ve found myself moving further and further away from the mental health profession and its view of the world. It’s always difficult to know how these things begin, especially for someone like me, who spent many years in front of therapists. For a long time, psychotherapy helped me. It gave me a language with which to express the abuses of my childhood. It allowed me a safe place in which to work out the ways in which the trauma was affecting my life. It helped me to move beyond being a victim to a survivor, and then it helped me move beyond being a survivor to simply being Rachel.

So where did it all go wrong between the mental health profession and me? I’m not sure it did. As is my history with most large groups, I just outgrew it. And once I outgrew it, I began to see all the ways in which its definitions were still limiting me, because I hadn’t dislodged those definitions from my brain.

The process of debriefing from the mental health profession began when I was still in therapy. I had a conversation with my therapist in which I began to realize that the paradigm I was developing was altogether different from the one in which he was comfortable. We were talking about diagnoses, and I was still very much wedded to the idea of having one—or so I thought. The conversation went something like this:

Me: When you write up your paperwork about our sessions, do you include a diagnosis?

My therapist: No.

Me: If you had to give me a diagnosis, what would it be?

My therapist: Well, you definitely have a mood disorder.

Me: I do?

My therapist: Yes.

Me: How do you define that?

My therapist: Well, you’re anxious and sad a lot.

Me: That means I have a disorder?

My therapist: Yes.

Me: But look at my situation. I’m dealing with being disabled in mid-life. The world is not set up to bring someone like me into full membership. In fact, I feel invisible most of the time. It makes me sad. I’m grieving. Anyone would feel sad and upset in that situation. Why does that mean I have a disorder?

My therapist: Because it’s your problem.

Me: What do you mean it’s my problem? I live in a society that renders me invisible. Why isn’t it society’s problem?

My therapist: Because it’s your problem.

Me: But I can’t solve it alone. I realize that I have to deal with what I’ve been given, but you can’t possibly expect me to just bear up cheerfully under the weight of all this difficulty. There’s a relationship between me and the world here. What about the world’s dysfunctionality? Why is this all on me?

My therapist: [insert patronizing therapist look here]

Me: Do you understand what I’m saying?

My therapist: Yes, and it’s still your problem.

Me: I can see we’re not getting anywhere.

I left therapy soon afterward.

I’ve thought of this conversation a great deal over the past few months. To my mind, it encapsulates everything that is wrong with the mental health profession:

1) Having a human emotion such as sadness, grief, anxiety, or anger in response to an ongoing traumatic, life-changing, unjust, or otherwise maddening situation is evidence of a disorder.

2) The medications I was taking were never on the table as a cause of my anxiety and depression. (As it turns out, they played a major role).

3) We don’t need to talk about disabilism, its impact on people, and how we need to change it.

4) People become transformed into patients and put into diagnostic boxes.

5) We only need to talk about how screwed up the patient is and how we need to change the patient.

Over the course of my life, I’ve been labeled (officially and unofficially) with depression, general anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, Asperger’s disorder, autism disorder, and sensory processing disorder. And next week, I’m going to an audiologist who will most likely diagnose me with auditory processing disorder.

I can’t tell you how depressing it is to keep collecting disorders like this. (I suppose that means that I have DODDD: Depressed over DSM Diagnoses Disorder.) All these labels have done a huge number on my head. If I’m going to live a full, happy, and empowered life, I need to send these diagnoses back to where they came from, because they are not me and they have nothing to do with me.

Let’s start with autism, since that’s what got me started thinking about this whole issue in the first place. Autism is not a disorder. It’s not a collection of impairments. It’s not a series of deficits. It’s not something that’s wrong with me. It only looks that way because I live in a society that values certain things to the exclusion of others. It values yacking about non-substantive things; I like substantive conversation. It values social chit-chat; I don’t do social chit-chat. It values being loud; I can’t spend any time in loud environments. It values going fast in every way possible; I cannot follow fast speech, fast-moving objects, or fast-moving graphics.

The society I live in is fearful of silence and deliberation. It thrives on mutually agreed upon deceptions. It abhors directness. It does not honor one’s word as one’s bond. It values appearance over substance. It tyrannizes us with the necessity for “positive thinking” above all else, as though it weren’t simply all right to give vent to one’s emotions when terrible things happen and heartbreak is the only sane response. In short, from my point of view, the society I live in is very unhealthy. Does that mean that something is wrong with me? Why? Because I’m in the minority and the majority is always right? Such nonsense.

My acute sensitivities are not a problem in and of themselves. My emotions are not a problem, in and of themselves. My post-traumatic stress issues are not even a problem, in and of themselves. All of these things can be a source of great power and heartfelt service to others if I use them properly. All of these things only become a problem when they go against an arbitrarily defined idea of “normal.” Then I get people trying to prescribe, discuss, and cure them out of me. But as a friend said to me the other day, please find me this “normal” person, because I haven’t stumbled across him yet. (And yes, the “normal” person is definitely a guy, because being male is part of the standard for “normal.”)

Of all the things that American culture values as “normal,” conformity is the most important. We talk about respecting difference, but if we respected difference, we’d just go around doing it and not talking about it all the time, now wouldn’t we? Here in America, the home of “rugged individualism,” we don’t respect difference. In fact, conformity is Job One. Here’s how it goes: You can only be a rugged individualist if you’re white, male, Christian, heterosexual, and fit into a certain unnamed place on the neurological spectrum. If you’re something else, it gets scary for those rugged individualists. I don’t know why all the rest of us on the racial, gender, religious, sexual, and neurological spectrum should make the rugged individualists faint, but apparently, we do.

When it comes down to it, autistic people, or bipolar people, or schizophrenic people, or traumatized people, or anyone in any other group of people, are just different from a mythic “norm” that simply doesn’t exist. There isn’t a person on the planet who won’t fit into a DSM diagnosis if you look hard enough—or who can’t be misdiagnosed into one if you don’t. They’ve got a diagnosis for everything a human being can possibly go through, which makes life itself a pathology and human beings nothing but walking disorders.

Well, I don’t believe that life is a pathology and that people are walking disorders. To heal this kind of mindset, I’m starting with my own distorted sense of myself as disordered—a distortion I’ve taken on as though it’s a clear reflection of who I am. It’s not. I know that now.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I’ve had an epiphany lately regarding my father and some of his formerly most mysterious and annoying habits.

As I’ve written before, it’s apparent to me that my dad was on the spectrum. Of course, no one ever talked about such things back then, so when I was growing up, the family explained my father’s oddities by saying that he was hard of hearing. Of course, he never went to an audiologist or had hearing aids or any of that nonsense. My mother used to say that he’d been born with nerve damage in his ears, and that no one could do anything about it. I’m virtually certain that she made up that story to explain the inexplicable, since she made up a lot of stories, and she believed them, too.

My father’s hearing issues were very aggravating to me as a kid, because every single time I said something, the very first thing out of his mouth was, “What?” Every single time. It was a reflex. It didn’t matter how loudly or how softly I spoke, or what else was happening in the room. He’d always say, “What?” When I had the patience, I’d repeat myself, in exactly the same tone of voice, and then he’d hear me. When I’d get exasperated with him and say, “Why aren’t you paying attention to me the first time?” his response would always be the same: “You’re mumbling.”

And that response would send me into the stratosphere, because I Did Not Mumble. No one else in the entire world ever said I mumbled. I knew that I was enunciating the English language perfectly well, and I still get an adrenaline rush just thinking about my father telling me otherwise. He knew how much it bothered me because, after awhile, he took on a new annoying habit: when he couldn’t hear me, he’d say “You’re mumbling,” and he’d laugh. And then I’d say, “I am not mumbling. You are not hearing me.” But it never made a difference. It was always “What?” and “You’re mumbling.” By the time I left home, it had nearly driven me up the wall and back.

For several years afterward, I continued to buy the idea that my father was hard of hearing. Then, one day, when my parents were visiting in California, everything changed. We were all in the car; my father was driving, and I was in the back seat. There was lots of ambient noise: highway noise, the sound of the car wheels running over the pavement, and everything else you hear in a car going 65 miles per hour on a six-lane freeway. Nonetheless, I said something to my father. I can’t even remember what it was, because I figured he wouldn’t hear it anyway. But, miracle of miracles, he heard me. The first time. Without saying “What?” or “You’re mumbling.” He just heard me, like a regular person, and he just answered me, like a regular person.

I suppose I should have felt angry, as though he’d been playing some sort of weird game all those years, but I wasn’t. I intuitively knew that he really had heard me clearly at that moment, and that he hadn’t been able to hear me before. I became fascinated by the contradiction, but I really didn’t know how to explain it.

These days, though, it makes perfect sense to me. After all, when I go out into the world, I often block my hearing—with earplugs, a Peltor headset, or both. Today, I’ve been able to wear just my earplugs, and hear people as though they’re at a distance, and say a few words in order to get my errands done. But tomorrow, when I go to my Voc Rehab appointment, I will have to wear the headset in order to block out ambient noise and allow myself to concentrate. In other words, I render myself more or less able to hear as needed.

I’m now realizing that my father must have had the same amount of auditory sensitivity and processing difficulty that I have, and that he intuitively came up with a survival strategy. Somehow, he selectively rendered himself deaf. It’s as though he just shut down his attention and literally couldn’t hear, and his saying “What?” was his signal to bring his attention back up. This strategy also provided him with a way to cushion himself against having to hear everything loud and clear the first time, and thus avoid becoming overloaded by it. It really was quite a brilliant strategy, and I’m in awe that he was able to pull it off. As for me—I simply cannot let my auditory attention wane. It’s always on alert, unless I block my ears. Then, even if I can hear somewhat, the person talking feels further away and the sound of his or her voice doesn’t penetrate my nervous system with anything like the same intensity. Somehow, my father was able to give himself the same experience without having to explain why he was wearing a lawnmower headset to go shopping.

My father is now gone, and even if he were still alive, he would not for a moment accept anything that I’m saying. He wouldn’t accept that we were both on the spectrum, he wouldn’t accept that we both had extraordinary sensory sensitivity, and he wouldn’t accept that I couldn’t overcome all of it by sheer force of will. In fact, he’d laugh me right out of the room for even broaching the subject.

So I’m just left with a new understanding of my dad, and it makes me feel closer to him. It consoles me to understand him better now.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Bob and I have been having some great conversations lately about the differences between neuro-typical and autistic modes of perception and communication. In the course of these conversations, I’ve felt immensely frustrated, strangely comforted, and very enlightened, sometimes simultaneously. I’ll share the highlights of two of these talks.

The Way Bob Says It Is Not The Way I’d Say It
On Saturday, Bob went to synagogue for the Shabbos morning service, came home for lunch, and then went back for the Torah study in the afternoon. I took a long walk in the morning, in the course of which I met a huge, grey, wonderfully shaggy dog and his person. As you know, I hardly ever take off my headphones and earplugs to talk to anyone, but this dog was just too cool and I had to say something to the woman with him. I knew that I’d last for about a minute or so of conversation, and I did, and it was fine.

The woman who was with the dog obviously loved and appreciated him, and said something like, “You know, he wants to go smell all of these great things and wonders why we can’t smell them, too!” Whoa. Another person who knows that human perception is not all there is. I had been missing these small moments of friendliness with people out on my walks, and as I continued down the street, I realized that I had made the exception for her based entirely on instinct and a sort of childlike delight in her dog. And I thought, “That’s a very good basis on which to make an exception.” When I was done, I didn’t need to go and chat it up with several other people about their canine friends. This dog was an exceptional being, so I made an exception, and it filled me up, and it was fine.

When Bob got home in the afternoon, he told me that he’d run into Fred at shul (the guy who’d magically rendered me invisible) and had “put him out of his misery” concerning my non-response to his email. Fred had copied Bob on his email to me (the one I’d deleted), the email had made Bob “want to weep,” and Bob had gently told Fred that there was nothing he could do to make things better except to keep moving forward. So, of course, the first thing I did was to get defensive about the “want to weep” part, until Bob reassured me that yes, he understood that I was the injured party. And then, of course, the next thing I did was to ask for a blow-by-blow of the conversation, just to make sure that Bob hadn’t put Fred out of his misery without Fred realizing why he was in a state of misery in the first place. I do this a lot, especially when Bob is talking to someone who has been crummy to me. Actually, I’ve been doing it for about eight years now, and it’s gotten old, and boring, and I hate boring, because being bored makes me miserable. This time, though, I’d finally had enough of boring and was able to get beyond making myself miserable. Here’s a synopsis of how the conversation went:

Me: “I’m glad you talked with Fred and resolved things. But did you tell him why things happened as they did?”
Bob: “He understood the whole thing.”
Me: “How do you know that?”
Bob: “I don’t remember all the words. It was clear. He knew what he’d done.”
Me: “But did you use the word invisibility?”
Bob: “No.”
Me: “Why not?”
Bob: “Look, I say things my way.”
Me: “Yeah, but the invisibility thing is really important!”
Bob: [Extremely unsubtle body language that says I'm going to get up and do something else now.]
Me: “Wait, wait, don’t get up! Look, I’m not resolved about this thing. I mean, I told the guy that I needed him to use his words, and that I needed him to be honest, and that I needed him to tell me what was going on, and then he didn’t. Did he understand all that?”
Bob: “Look, I’m not in the guy’s head, and I don’t know what words he’s using to understand things, but he understood that he’d screwed this up and why, okay?”
Me: “Yeah, but how do you know what he understood if he didn’t say so?”
Bob: “I was there. I know.”
Me: “Yeah, but…Oh.”
[Silence]
Bob: “What?”
Me: “This is a neuro-typical thing, isn’t it? You say words, and he says words, and you do this whole nonverbal dance, and you somehow get it, and it’s done, and it’s in your own language. And then you come home and you say it to me. And then I try to translate it back into my language, and it doesn’t translate well.”
Bob: “I think that’s right.”
Me: “You know, from now on, I think you should handle these kinds of conversations. They’re a mystery to me, but you’re very good at them.”
Bob: “Thanks. I try.”
Me: “I know. I don’t give you enough credit.”
Bob: “I know. And you do really well speaking your language to people who understand you. It’s not your fault that neuro-typical people so often don’t understand what you’re talking about, or can’t fathom how sensitive you are or what you need from them.”
Me: “Thank you, honey. I love you.”
Bob: “I love you, too.”

So here was a day in which I came to two very important conclusions: 1) If I’m going to talk to an apparently neuro-typical stranger, keep it short and make sure it’s for a very good reason, and 2) let Bob be neuro-typical and handle things in his own way, because after all, he is completely supportive of my being autistic and handling things in my own way. (I think I’ve got that reciprocity thing down now.)

I Stand By the Side of the Road and I Still End Up In a Crash
The other day, Bob and I were driving down the highway, and I was talking about my frustration with socializing and making friends with neuro-typical people. One of things that became clear is that all of my challenges started showing up when I left the controlled situation of the workplace in 2003 and entered the completely chaotic situation of unstructured human interaction.

In the software industry, I did very well. I lasted 15 years, much longer than I’ve lasted in any other group of people. Because it was a limited, goal-oriented situation, it gave me the opportunity to do one of the things I do best: observe process. I figured out how meetings worked, what people needed from me, how to set limits, how to keep from working overtime, how to get what I needed to do my job, and so forth. I moved from job to job, but each time, I moved to a better job, and I did so based on my reputation, both personal and professional. Plus, working in the software industry coincided with a number of other successes: marriage, parenting, buying a house, and becoming part of a neighborhood.

And then, I left work to become a full-time mom and oy, all my troubles started. All of a sudden, I couldn’t navigate. True, I had entered hostile territory in my old community, but not every single person there was hostile, and a neuro-typical person might have handled the situation with more, shall we say, subtlety? I handled the situation with almost nothing except honesty and directness, because after all, isn’t that what Judaism teaches? Thou shalt not lie? And isn’t that what all my years in therapy had led me to believe I was destined to do—state my needs and feelings with clarity and without apology? So what was the problem? Why was everyone so upset when I kept speaking my mind and getting down to business? The more I tried, the worse it got. I’m not saying that I was to blame. Not at all. I’m just saying that I didn’t understand how to do it any other way.

But now, I’m starting to see that the way I do it has caused me to collide with other people and has allowed them to collide with me. When it’s over, there’s usually a scene of twisted metal and steam rising from cracked radiators, and I’m always wondering what the hell happened. Again. Just like last time. Over. And over. And over. And over.

In the course of my conversation with Bob in the car, I began to understand why this pattern has gone on for so long, and that I am already moving to a different paradigm. Here’s basically how the conversation went:

Me: “I know that neuro-typical people often find me rather blunt and feel offended by me. And it’s very weird to me, because in my sensory and emotional experience of the world, I feel like I’m getting hit with a blunt instrument a fair amount of the time. It’s not that everyone has ill will toward me. They don’t. It’s just how acutely I feel things. Most people don’t know how sensitive I am, and so they can’t understand how they affect me. And I don’t understand how important all their social rules and nonverbals signals are, so I don’t understand how difficult I can be for people to deal with. I just think that all that social crap—I mean stuff—is bullshit.”
Bob: “I know. There definitely seems to be a difference in the way that neuro-typical and autistic people experience bluntness.”
Me: “So how do neuro-typical people experience it?”
Bob: “Well, for us, there are two levels to navigating socially. One level is knowing what you want. The other level is trying to make sure not to crash into people’s sensibilities. It’s as though social life is like driving down the highway we’re on. You have to know where you’re going and how to get there. But if that’s all you know, you’re going to cause an accident, because you won’t be looking in your rearview mirrors, you won’t be watching the flow of traffic, you won’t know when to slow down, or speed up, or let someone into the lane, or pass them. Everything works on a highway if everyone is paying attention to everything. But now and then, you get someone going 95 miles per hour who insists on switching lanes constantly, driving in the breakdown lane, and getting past everyone, because he just has to get where he’s going and that’s all he can think about. That’s when the flow is threatened and people start crashing into one another.”
Me: “Okay, so I recognize myself in the person who just wants to get there. I recognize myself so well that I’ve learned to hang back in a major way and let everyone else go around me. In fact, I’ve gotten out of the damned car altogether, and yet, I still end up in crashes.”
Bob: “What do you mean, exactly?”
Me: “Take the situation with Fred. I didn’t walk into a complicated social situation with Fred. I kept it simple. I know better than to drive a car on a highway. I’ve learned my lesson. I wasn’t even in a car. I was standing by the side of the road, looking at the trees, waiting for him to get done driving hither and yon and meet up with me. After awhile, I realized he wasn’t going to come by and get me, and that made me sad, but I dealt with it. And then, all of a sudden, he broadsided me. I was just standing by the side of the goddamned road, looking at the trees blossoming, and the next thing I knew, I was lying next to the retaining wall and my head hurt really bad.”
Bob: “I see what you mean.”
Me: “You know, whenever this has happened in the past, I’ve thought, well, screw this, I’m getting off this highway and finding me another highway, because the people on this highway are crazed. And then I go and find another highway, and I stand by the side of the road, and bang! There I go, flying through the air, just when I’m enjoying the view. And I think, well, screw this, I’m getting off this highway, because the people on this highway are crazed. But now, after all these years, I can’t keep looking for new highways. They’re too dangerous. I imagine that there must be state police shouting at me on their bullhorns that pedestrians are not allowed on the roadway, and there must be people leaning on their horns as they swerve away from me, and the ones who come a little too close must be larger than they appear in the mirror, but somehow, I can’t see or hear them.”
Bob: “I think that’s true. So what do you do?”
Me: “I need to go find myself a bike path. Not a bike path where people wear spandex and race by you like they’re on the Tour de France. I mean a bike path where people are taking leisurely rides and other people are standing by the side of the road.”
Bob: “Sounds like a plan.”

So how do I find these other souls on this mysterious bike path? Easy. I write an article for my local paper, asking “Where are all the other autistic or otherwise atypical people in this community, because I’ve only met two others, and it’s statistically impossible that we are the only ones here.”

I know, I know. It’s very direct. But that’s just me.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

What This Post Is Not About: This post is not about healing autism or any of the expressions or manifestations of autism. Autism is not a disease or a disorder. If you interested in healing or curing autism, you are so on the wrong blog.

What This Post Is About: This post is about the fact that I have finally figured out that there is absolutely nothing wrong with me, and that I need to begin healing from my relationship with a mental health establishment and pharmaceutical industry that are doing me far more harm than good. I say this not as an anti-medical zealot, and I am certainly not telling anyone else what to do. I am speaking solely for myself, as an autistic individual who realizes that the system is all upside-down and backwards regarding what I need.

As many of you might have gathered, the past month or so has been very difficult for me. One of the triggers has been that I’ve inadvertently overcome (for the moment) my lifelong use of food as a means of sensory and emotional self-regulation. In other words, I’ve gone cold-turkey off my food addiction. Here’s how the current round began:

A few weeks back, I mentioned to the doctor who manages my medications that I had had a killer migraine and that it had been the first time in years I hadn’t been able to knock out the earliest warning signs with Sumatriptan. When he asked how many times a week I was taking Sumatriptan, and I casually answered, “Oh, about three or four,” he said that I was actually getting three or four migraines a week. The fact that I was recognizing the early symptoms and intervening did not mean that I wasn’t getting them; it just meant that I was stopping the worst effects of them. So, he suggested a preventive, Topamax, which is also an anti-seizure medication. I was to start out with one tablet a week, and progress to two, and then to three. He warned me that one side effect would be appetite suppression.

Nearly three weeks later, I’ve lost seven pounds I didn’t need to lose. Until yesterday, I was in so much emotional pain that it was physically almost unbearable. Much of the emotional pain was the result of withdrawing, without warning, from the food addiction and experiencing all the emotions that came screaming out into the open. As of Monday, the worst of the withdrawal and its attendant demons seem to have past. Now, I’m left mainly with the physical impact of the medication, which is not having an exactly inspiring impact on my emotional state: I’m nauseous almost all the time, I have no appetite, I lose my balance several times a day, and I’m suffering from acute exhaustion.

On Monday, I went to see an alternative practitioner. Bob had spoken highly of her, and I thought, “Why not?” Just to get the negative out of the way first: She was a complete and total pain in the ass about autism. She kept saying things like, “You’re not autistic” and “You don’t have to use such a negative word about yourself.” And yes, she kept saying these things despite the fact that I consistently responded with sentences like “Autism is a very positive word for me.” She kept on at random intervals until I just about wanted to explode. (I didn’t. Score one more for the autistic kid!)

But what she got right was astonishing. Right away, she said that I have a lifelong issue with feeling radically unsafe, as though every millisecond of every day, some disaster will happen and I won’t be able to handle it. I had said nothing past a few pleasantries and “Where is your bathroom?” She just saw it. At one point, she tried to do some mind-body work with me and, when I started crying uncontrollably, she asked if I were on any medication. When I listed out my anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and anti-migraine meds, she said something to the effect of, “The medication is getting in the way of your being able to develop your mind and spirit. It’s numbing you out.” I had been thinking along similar lines of late. She suggested that I wean off my medications extremely slowly and carefully and go to an herbal healer (at the cost of about $600/hour—not happening) to cleanse and balance my system. Instead, when I got home, I bought an herbal cleansing system online that I’ve used before with very good results. It’s a first step. The package should arrive in the next week or so.

At the moment, healing my body is my life’s work and it doesn’t get much more basic than that. I’ve got a five-part plan, and I’m aware that it’s going to take a long while, and that it’s going to be a full-time job. It’s also going to be a very good reason to get up in the morning, because I like getting down to basics very, very much. Here’s the plan:

1. Cleanse my system using herbal formulae and lots of water (three months).

2. Wean myself off my medications and find natural alternatives.

I’m going to start weaning off the Topamax tonight. I added one tablet last week, and now I’m up to three, so going back to two should be fine. I reduced my anti-anxiety med, Lorazepam, by a third as of last night, and I actually slept better than I had in a long time. My aim is to wean off the Topamax and Lorazepam first, and leave the Zoloft for last. I figure a) the Topamax is new and I’ve lived without it for most of my life and b) the Zoloft takes care of anxiety, so I’m covered.

And yes, I’m being careful. Trust me. I value my health and my sanity very highly. Bob and I are going in together to see my prescribing doctor at the end of the month to discuss the whole matter.

3. Start buying nutritious food, cook it myself, and feed myself three times a day.

This one will be demanding, but I am determined.

4. Declare my independence of the so-called mental health profession.

If I don’t get myself away from the therapists and the psychiatrists and the mental health professionals, I swear to God, they’re going to drive me into insanity. Sometimes, I think that if I see my therapist one more time, my exhaustion will become so acute that I will never recover. And if my prescribing doctor tells me again that I just need to have more fun, I think my eyeballs are going to pop out.

I can’t begin to catalogue all the many things that aren’t working, so I will just give you my overall sense. First of all, my therapist, whom I see once a week, is a very nice man. However, I get the feeling that every week, we are practicing psychotherapy on each other. I am sitting there, trying to understand how his mind works, and he is sitting there, trying to understand how my mind works. The difference between us is that he thinks he understands how my mind works when he doesn’t, and I know that I don’t have a clue about how his mind works, except that it works differently from mine. This difference in both cognitive pattern and insight means that he consistently gives me advice that would work for someone who is neuro-typical and/or does not have my difficulties with language, auditory processing, and acute emotional/empathic sensitivities.

So, the last time we spoke, and I mentioned my desire to meet other autistic and otherwise disabled people, he reminded me not to forget about the neuro-typical people in my life with whom I get along and whom I love—namely, my husband and daughter—and that I should consider befriending neuro-typical people as well. Now, it’s not that I don’t have neuro-typical friends. I do. Some are in California, some are in Massachusetts, and one is in Minnesota. (I had another one out west, but he turned out to be on the spectrum. Yay! Next to Bob, I consider him my closest friend.) But all of these neuro-typical friends are ones I made when I could still pass for neuro-typical. In the present tense, which is where I currently live (sorry for the redundancy, but I couldn’t resist), I can’t pass. I can’t meet people in public settings and talk with them. I can’t go dancing. I can’t go to public lectures. I can’t go to synagogue. How exactly am I supposed to meet neuro-typical people, much less hang out with them in their usual haunts? My attempts to get them to hang out with me in ways that work for me have not been wildly successful.

However, all of these basic, logistical, physical, unchangeable realities of my autistic life, which I have explained patiently to my therapist, and in great detail, over the course of many months, seem to fly out of his brain for no apparent reason. Someday, someone will do some research as to why such important pieces of data would mysteriously disappear from the brain of an otherwise intelligent neuro-typical therapist with a PhD, but until he consents to be a research subject (and one of his peers consents to make him one), I just don’t see it happening.

And then there’s my prescribing doctor, who I like to call Dr. Meds. Like my therapist, he is a very nice man. As psychiatrists go, he knows his pharmaceuticals—to a point, that point being how medications react on the bodies of neuro-typical people. And of course, he would know only how they react on the bodies of neuro-typical people because, to my knowledge, pharmaceutical companies don’t seek out autistic people as test subjects. So, he gives me Topamax, which is an anti-seizure medication, which means it affects my neurological system—my very, very, very sensitive neurological system. So, cool, I’m not getting migraines. Or seizures. But then again, I never got seizures, so now, my brain is so overloaded with medication to keep it calm that I’m falling asleep in the middle of the day and falling down on a regular basis. And the appetite suppression? Appetite suppresion I could live with. The Topamax has put my appetite into a coma. It’s on life support. It’s got tubes sticking out all over the place and my former mother-in-law (who doesn’t speak to me anymore, and no, it wasn’t anything I said) has activated the prayer chain in her church on its behalf.

It’s pretty unbelievable when the people who are supposed to be helping you don’t know anything about autism. It’s even more unbelievable when they don’t think they need to know anything about autism. It’s even more unbelievable when they don’t think they need to know anything about autism and they prescribe you medication.

5. Publish my book.

I know that it doesn’t seem like publishing a book is up there with weaning off medication and eating more carrots, but it’s been immensely healing to nurture my book toward publication.

And so, dear friends and readers, if you have any wisdom regarding natural remedies that you have found beneficial, by all means, please share. And if you don’t and just want to comment on this post, by all means, please do!

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

In my never-ending quest to find a few safe places to hang out that don’t include my house, I decided to consider (duh!) the library. I used to volunteer there packaging books for inter-library loans, and I left mainly because I was only beginning to understand the impact of autism on my body and soul. When I left, I told the staff I was leaving to take care of my health, and they all signed a really beautiful card to wish me well. Sigh. These kinds of things mean a lot to me. So the people there are very nice and the place feels very safe.

However, I haven’t been back there since. My resistance stems mainly from the fact that they used to know me as this still somewhat passable NT-looking person, and now I’m not. I feel like I’d be walking into an old picture and getting confused about how to navigate.

So, last night, I finally realized (duh!) that I could send them an email and create a new picture. Here’s the note I sent them today via their website:

“Hi—

You might remember me. I used to volunteer at the library packaging ILLs. I’m writing to let you know how I am so that I can get the services that I need at the library.

In the past year and a half, I have been diagnosed with a number of disabilities. I am autistic with extreme auditory and other sensory sensitivities, so much so that I usually have to block sound when I am out in public. When I come into the library, I will probably be wearing a blue noise-blocking headset, a set of earplugs, or both.

Autism is a very inconsistent condition. Sometimes, I’m able to talk for a short time without a lot of effort. At other times, a short conversation is so difficult that it will leave me with severe body aches for days. There may be some days that all I can do is smile and wave, and a smile and wave in return is the perfect response. I would ask that, when I come to the library, you take my lead regarding how I communicate. When I go about my life in public and need something specific, I generally play it safe and communicate in writing. I am looking into assistive communication technology, so I may have an iPad or some other interesting device with me. It’s a work in progress.

Please remember that the changes you will see are superficial. I am still the same person I ever was. I just can’t navigate in typical ways anymore.

I would appreciate it if you would confirm receipt of this note, and especially if you would share it with the staff.

Many thanks, and all the best to everyone,
Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg”

Let’s see what happens, shall we?

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Before I launch into the saga of how I made it through the past month in one piece, I wish to point out the following: I refer to the period between the last Thursday in November and the 25th day of December as the Christmas season. I refuse to call it the holiday season.

Why? Because I’m a foolish Aspie who believes in calling things by their proper names. I look around me at this time of year, and I see pretty lights and decorated trees. If I walk into a public place, turn on my radio, or watch TV, I hear Christmas carols. If I speak to another living soul, chances are that said living soul is either very, very excited or very, very stressed out about buying presents to put under the tree. What do any of these things have to do with Chanuka? Or Kwanzaa? Or the Buddha’s birthday? Or any other holiday on the face of the planet except Christmas? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Of course, many people celebrate Christmas as a secular holiday, concentrating on it as a solstice celebration. And certainly, as the Festival of Lights, Chanuka must have had its origins in the primal human need to shine a light in darkness. But my practicing Jewish mind cannot forget that Christmas isn’t simply a solstice celebration. For most people in the world, it’s a religious holiday, and while I can turn just about any piece of religious text into a metaphor, it’s very hard for me to be confronted by a life-size manger scene and symbolize it away. I experience the world so visually that these kinds of things have a visceral impact that I just can’t shake.

So, I like to call the season what it is. It’s Christmas time. For people who love Christmas, who have wonderful times with family, and who are not easily overwhelmed by crowds or by the excited, frenzied energy of other people, it’s a happy time. I respect that. I accept that others have customs and beliefs of their own, and I do my best not to complain during the Christmas season—at least, not outside my own house. Now that Christmas has passed, however, I want share how I deal with a time of year that I typically dread.

For most of my life, I’ve always identified my dread as that of a Jewish woman surrounded by the trappings of an entirely alien culture. It’s not as though I see my Jewishness reflected in the larger culture in July or anything, but at Christmas time, I cannot go anywhere and find respite from the goings on. To put it bluntly: Christmas is in my face wherever I go. There is no escaping it. I’ve even tried going on Jewish spiritual retreats in December, only to have people sing Hebrew prayers to the tune of Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer. You haven’t lived till you’ve seen a guy in a tallis singing Adon Olam to the tune of a Christmas carol.

Now that I realize that I’m autistic, I’ve become aware that I’m not just feeling the alienation that springs from being a member of a religious and cultural minority. In the best of times, being autistic means that I feel as though I live in a foreign country and will never fully learn the language. At Christmas time, that feeling intensifies by several orders of magnitude. I don’t understand what all the excitement is about, and I can’t even begin to parse the social rules. When someone wishes me a “Merry Christmas,” what am I supposed to say? I almost reflexively say, “Same to you,” but inside, I’m thinking, “I don’t celebrate Christmas. Why do you think I do? Now I’ve just gone and pretended that I do, which is a lie.” I get caught between the social niceties and the truth. It happens the rest of the year, too, but at Christmas it happens just about all the time. 

Unfortunately, the more generic “Happy Holidays” greeting does not remedy the situation. I know that people are trying to be ecumenical and embracing, but it doesn’t work. At least, it doesn’t work for me, especially during those years when Chanuka begins in early- to mid-December and is already over before I get wished a happy one. At those moments, I have to choose between saying, “Same to you” and “My holiday is already over.” Because I am a nice person, I usually just say, “Same to you,” but I’m basically lying. Again. I’m suggesting that I’m still happily celebrating Chanuka when all the latkes have already been eaten and all the menorahs have already been put away.

This year, I began to realize that being autistic gives me a bonafide, neurological reason for staying away from all the goings on associated with Christmas. At any other time of the year, I am very careful about where I go. In order to avoid sensory and empathic overload, I stay away from loud places. I stay away from crowds. I wear earplugs and a noise-blocking headset just to go grocery shopping. So going out during the Christmas season is absolutely out of the question. All the frenzied, stressed, excited energy out there would hit me like a tsunami, and I’d come home exhausted, disoriented, and sick. Why do that to myself? There is no good reason.

So, starting on Thanksgiving, I went on retreat—in my own house. Of course, I planned ahead. I made sure that I had sufficient food from my four major food groups: protein, winter vegetables, spelt flatbread, and dark chocolate. I cancelled my volunteer work, my ASL tutoring, my trips to the co-op, and every other outside activity except my therapy appointments. In fact, when I told my therapist how I was spending my time, he said, “What a great idea! If more of my clients said ‘If I haven’t bought it by Thanksgiving, it’s not getting bought,’ I would see a significant improvement in their moods and levels of functioning.” I felt supported.

Other than my weekly trips to the therapist, I stayed home and did all kinds of fun things. I did some quilting. I exercised on my stationary bike. I got all the materials ready for knitting Bob a sweater. I joined Facebook and found an astonishing number of childhood friends. I did some very satisfying genealogical research on Ancestry.com. I had some very nice contact with a cousin who sent me some wonderful old family pictures. I watched an episode of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” with Ashlynne and several episodes of “The Wire” with Bob. I supported Bob’s week-long trip to California, and I enjoyed the solitude. A lot. Surprise!

Of course, I also celebrated Chanuka and Ashlynne’s 17th birthday. This year, Ashlynne got the use of my car, and I got the best present ever: two of my Facebook friends, who are not Jewish, wished me a happy Chanuka while it was still Chanuka! Do I have good judgment when it comes to friends, or what?

I had a good time. And I’m in a good mood. And after January 1st, I’m going to resume my regular activities.

I like this way of passing the Christmas season. I’m going to make it a tradition.

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Several weeks ago, I received an email from a mom whose autistic son resisted getting undressed and changing his clothes. She wondered why he was having such a hard time. After writing back to her, I started to become more and more aware of my own difficulties in this regard—difficulties that have never really changed over the course of my life, despite my numerous attempts to “get it together” and be like other people

Unless I have to go somewhere, I find it very hard to get out of my pajamas. In the winter, I wear thermals at night, and I often find myself just throwing on a skirt in the morning and being done with it. If I manage to get out of my pajamas at all, I might put on workout clothes and spend a couple of hours on my bike. When I’m done, though, I feel quite attached to what I’m wearing. I only change into a proper set of clothes if I’m having a guest or going out. If I do manage to put on something suitable for appearing in public, I have to deal with the whole issue of putting on pajamas at night. I’ll remember to put them on if I’m lucky. Otherwise, I’m apt to fall asleep in my clothes.

For me, these difficulties all come down to my tactile sensitivities. I resist the discomfort of making a transition from one temperature to another. When I change my clothes, especially in the winter, I’m apt to get cold. Lately, I’ve been reminding myself that I can turn on the heater in the bathroom and have it direct warmth on me, but the resistance to actually getting there is very ingrained. And though I love to take a hot shower, getting myself to do it takes a lot of effort. There’s the chill before going in and the chill after coming out. There’s all this complicated transitional stuff having to do with the discarded clothing, the new clothing, the wet hair, the sound of the blow dryer, the floor mats that have to be hung up to dry, and the eyeglasses that get so fogged up that I’m apt to walk into a door on my way out. 

I sometimes judge myself harshly for my difficulties around these issues of personal care, but I know that the challenges are sensory. So long as I keep my clothes clean and take a shower every other day, no one seems to mind. Yay!

Issues of temperature aside, the very prospect of changing my clothes makes me feel more sensory sensitive than usual. To a large degree, my clothes give me a feeling of having a “thicker skin”—something that people have always told me I should try to develop (with less than spectacular results). There are times that I can’t bear to go outside because I’m in such an acutely sensitive state that my skin feels as though it’s made of tissue paper. At such times, my clothing is like a security blanket with which I don’t want to part, not even for a minute. I wear baggy, comfortable, cotton clothing that I find at thrift stores or, better yet, in free boxes. I don’t know what the latest styles are, and I couldn’t care less. So long as my clothing feels like a comfort to me, I’m happy.

Do others have these challenges? I know I can’t be the only one, but it’s not a subject I’ve noticed others writing about. Many thanks to one of my autie mom readers for raising the issue.

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I’ve been struggling in my ASL class, and Michelle’s comment about how visual input can affect auditory processing gave me some insight as to why. While my last post was about my auditory sensitivities overwhelming my visual sense, this post is about what happens when most of the stimuli are visual.

First things first, though: My ASL class, as it turns out, is not as quiet as I thought it would be. While the course syllabus says that there is no talking upon entering the classroom, people are still talking before class. When I asked the teacher for clarification, she said that she doesn’t feel she can ask people not to talk when they don’t know enough ASL to otherwise communicate. I was hoping that they could just be quiet and have the experience of how it feels to have to adapt, but alas, another of my great ideas is just…well, another of my great ideas. Anyway, with my earplugs and headset on, I can still hear people’s voices. I can’t hear words, but I can hear what sounds like undifferentiated noise, and it wears me out before the class even starts. Were I to show up right at the beginning of class, however, it wouldn’t make much of a difference. The teacher jokes around a lot, so there’s a lot of laughter, and it’s quite distracting. Most of the time, I feel exactly as I do in the rest of the world: I wonder why everyone else is making noise when I’m trying so hard to concentrate.

But the problem isn’t just sound. It’s the fact that being in a room full of people is very disorienting. Even if the room were silent for two hours, I’d have all the visuals of people moving around, using their hands, gesturing in nonverbal ways, expressing things with their faces, and thereby distracting the living hell out of me. In the class, I have to focus very hard just to communicate and respond to the simplest signs in the language—signs that I can easily use and understand when I’m watching my ASL DVD, or showing Bob or Ashlynne what I’m learning. I need more structure, more quiet, and fewer people in order to learn and to use what I’m learning.

Unfortunately, the class feels very unstructured and chaotic to me. The description says that we’re supposed to be learning Units 1 through 6 of the book we got, but we’re already three classes into a 12-week course and we’re not even all the way through Unit 1. When I asked the teacher about the homework after the second day of class, she said that she doesn’t give homework, and that we should just study the material in the book on our own. Then, when I asked whether we could use signs in class that we’ve learned from the book, she said no, because not everyone will have learned the same signs. She only wants us to use the signs that she’s taught us in the class so that we can all learn them together. 

I understand what she’s trying to accomplish, but my brain doesn’t work that way. I have to learn things outside of class in order to really understand how to do them; I can’t just pick them up from watching her once a week and remember them when I get home. There is far too much in my visual field for me to be able to discern what I’m supposed to remember. And of course, once I get back to class, I can’t remember what signs she’s taught and what signs I’ve learned from the book.

And then there’s my moderate dyspraxia. I have a lot of trouble watching, imitating, and sequencing moving visuals, and ASL is one long series of complex visuals. While it’s a beautiful language, and I love learning it, I’m also finding it very challenging. When visuals are static, I can focus on them to my heart’s content and see all kinds of patterns and colors. When visuals are moving, it’s very difficult. I can get there, but it takes time and work. I’m willing to put in the time and work, but I need a different learning environment. The present one isn’t working for me.

I finally understand why Aspie kids need IEPs and one-on-one aides. I need educational supports at 51 that just aren’t there in a regular classroom. I’ve emailed my contact at the school about finding some other way to learn and practice ASL. Perhaps someone would be willing to tutor me? I don’t know. Wish me luck!

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I’ve been wondering whether there is a connection between my auditory oversensitivity and my inability to see nonverbal cues. I rely on my visual sense a great deal, and I experience the visual world with great intensity, so being unable to see nonverbals that are (apparently) right in front of me is very puzzling. It’s as though some obstacle were in the way.

I have read posts by other Aspies who say that they can see a person’s nonverbal signals all at once, but that they can’t understand the signals until later. These folks can replay interactions in their minds in order to view the nonverbals individually and interpret them. I envy Aspies who have this ability. When I’m interacting with a person, I don’t see any nonverbal signals of which I’m aware, so understanding these signals later is out of the question.

In last week’s ASL class, I began to get a hint of what might be the source of the problem. I was blocking out sound almost entirely, so I could not make out any words for the entire two hours. Because people were allowed to speak in the first two classes, some of them were taking the opportunity to ask a lot of questions. I couldn’t hear the questions, but my virtual deafness allowed me to observe people without any auditory distraction. All at once, I noticed that I was watching how one of my classmates used her hands and her facial muscles when asking a question. The inclination to watch felt intuitive, but my interpretation was on a wholly conscious level. I thought, “She’s moving her hands in such a way as to appear authoritative about what she’s saying. Her face gives me the feeling that she takes the subject matter of the question very seriously.”

I have no idea whether my interpretation was correct, but based on my previous interaction with the person, it was (at the very least) a good guess.

So, I got to thinking: Have I failed to see nonverbal signals all my life because I’ve been so distracted and overwhelmed by sound? As compelling as the visual world is to me, the auditory world commands my attention. Whether I’m listening to someone use a hammer, whisper in a movie theatre, or talk in a large group, my response is always the same: I can’t help but hear it, and I can’t help but be overstimulated and overtaken by it. It’s entirely possible that I’m not interpreting the nonverbals because my ears have been using up too much of my attention. Besides, because I’m always a click or two behind in a conversation, I’m spending so much time parsing the words that I haven’t got time for the nonverbals. And once I parse the words, the nonverbals that went along with them are already gone.

It’s also possible that my visual and auditory systems function in analogous ways. Just as I can hear everything very clearly, but can’t prioritize, filter, or interpret competing sounds, so I might also be seeing all the nonverbal signals very clearly, but can’t parse, separate, or interpret what’s right in front of me. When I walk into a large, noisy social gathering, I hear very little except pure, undifferentiated sound, and I overload immediately. Perhaps each person has the same effect on me visually: all the nonverbal signals get piled on top of one another until I see nothing except undifferentiated gestures and facial expressions whose cumulative impact is quite pronounced. After all, a face-to-face conversation is an extremely intense experience for me. It’s unusual that I can talk with anyone except a close family member without becoming overwhelmed. Perhaps I avert my eyes because I’m actually overloading on nonverbals.

If taking in undifferentiated sound has an impact, taking in undifferentiated nonverbals must have an impact as well. With sound, the result is auditory overload; with nonverbals, it seems to be empathic overload. Although I can’t parse the nonverbals, I have a very powerful experience of almost every person with whom I come into contact. I can feel the person’s mood and emotion. It’s a wonderful ability to have in a scary situation, but it’s close to disabling when I’m just trying to go grocery shopping.

Some people would call this kind of intuition a sixth sense, but I don’t believe that I have a sixth sense. I seem to have exquisitely acute senses that bring me information in ways that I don’t always consciously understand.

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg