Journeys with Autism

A little while ago, I interviewed my friend Ben about the road he took to an autism diagnosis. I related very much to Ben’s process. Perhaps you will, too.

Rachel: When did you first suspect that you were on the spectrum?
 
Ben: Well, I never suspected I was. I have a friend who had figured it out for herself about six months earlier and asked me if I had ever heard of Asperger’s Syndrome. It was almost like the time my mom asked me if I was gay. After we talked for a while, I went home and spent several days researching AS online, exhaustively. I got books out of the library (Pretending to be Normal and Tony Attwood’s guide, among others). I had spent my life knowing I was odd and different, and now I had a label to hang on it.
 
Rachel: How did you feel about discovering that you’re on the spectrum?
 
Ben: I swung back and forth between elation that I wasn’t the only person like this, that there was a name, that it was even a “syndrome,” to feeling that I now had to give up on some long-standing but pretty useless aspirations for myself. I was worried what this might mean for my relationship, too. After all, my partner already knew me and wasn’t going to be freaked out by a label, but I was worried he might be upset at what he’d have to give up as well—like the possibility that I would never be okay going camping, or out to clubs to go dancing (without my earplugs). The up side is that even though my partner isn’t an Aspie, he shares some significant AS-like traits, which helps in the areas of sympathy and understanding.

It’s been over a year, and I still have days that I’m sad when I realize there’s a particular something I’m never going to be good at.
 
Rachel: When did you self-diagnose and what assessment tools did you use?
 
Ben: Winter of 2008. I used the DSM-IV definitions, but found online personal experiences of people to be much more confirming. The DSM doesn’t cover weird AH HA! moments like:

Clothing tags!
Eating habits!
Sensory overload and extreme sensitivity!

Have I ever met a person with my amazing sense of smell? Not really. It’s fun but almost useless in daily life, and sometimes distracting or debilitating.
 
Rachel: Did you bring your self-diagnosis to a therapist?
 
Ben: I spoke with my therapist, whom I was seeing for cognitive behavioural therapy for depression (!) and anxiety(!). I don’t think he believed I could have AS because I made excellent eye contact (thank you!) and could be gregarious and talkative (nervousness channeled). He said we could find some specialists and get a formal diagnosis, but never pursued it. I stopped seeing him about four or five months after telling him about the AS.
 
Rachel: Why did you decide to seek out an “official” diagnosis?
 
Ben: I finally asked my family doctor for a referral, about ten months after my self-diagnosis. I wanted one for medical reasons, to be able to treat some of the anxiety and other complications that come up for many Aspies. I wanted to find out if I could access government programs or assistance for the disabled. I wanted a “piece of paper” that I could have ready when the world said I just needed to work harder at it and that I could be like everybody else.

What can I say? I was brought up in the same culture that values certification and credentials.
 
Rachel: How did you feel about the prospect of diagnosis?
 
Ben: Nervous.
 
Rachel: When did you have the assessment?
 
Ben: Last October, 2009.
 
Rachel: What did it consist of?
 
Ben: Sitting down with a psychiatrist and talking over the usual AS points.
 
Rachel: How long did it take, and when did you get the results?
 
Ben: About an hour, and he told me immediately. The results were forwarded to my family doctor.
 
Rachel: Has your “official” diagnosis been a positive step? Has it had any significant impact on your life, positive or negative?
 
Ben: Mostly positive. It kind of gets any “Am I or am I not?” questions out of the way. It makes sure my family doctor knows I’m not making it up, but it hasn’t had a huge impact on my life. I was quite certain I had AS before the diagnosis, but because the definition and the right to access services were controlled by others, I needed to be “officially” AS in order to consider telling anybody in authority (government agencies, employers, etc.) that I did indeed have Asperger’s Syndrome.
 
Rachel: What do you like most about being on the spectrum?
 
Ben: My slightly tangential approach to thinking and problem solving. My acute senses and “noticing” of things.
 
Rachel: Ben, thank you for sharing your experience.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

My daughter Ashlynne is a junior in high school. For her journalism class, she keeps a blog about events and issues of interest to her. After seeing autism in the news recently, she decided to write about the most recent and infamous Autism Speaks video. She sent me the link to her post and gave me permission to mention it on my blog. If you’d like to read her piece, you can find it here.

It’s very heartening to know that my daughter sees the issues so clearly and that she is sharing her knowledge with her peers. Way to go, Ashlynne!

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

When I first started therapy (in 1983), I learned that I had to work on improving my self-image. I learned that I had low self-worth, and that if I worked very, very hard, my sense of self-worth would improve.

And it did. I think. At least, I was under the impression that it improved, because I was feeling ever more confident about my abilities as a working woman, a wife, and a mother.

But now I’m experiencing a new phenomenon. I no longer have low self-worth. What I have is no self-worth. At all.

That’s right. None.

I am not exaggerating. Last night, I looked at myself and realized that there is a big empty space where my self-worth ought to be. How my self-worth snuck off without my noticing is beyond my comprehension. But it’s gone. I’ve looked, and it just ain’t there.

Perhaps it went like this: Seven years ago, when I married Bob, I quit my full-time job to become a full-time homeschooling mom; then, a few years later, my daughter went to regular school, and the homeschooling ended. So, in the past seven years, two of the most important ways that I built my self-esteem have gone away: working at a job and homeschooling Ashlynne. During much of that time, I lived in a community that was not very welcoming to me (to put it mildly), and that experience further contributed to my self-esteem issues.

But, you see, I still had “self-esteem issues.” There was some self-esteem with which to work. Now, it’s just up and left.

It’s possible that with working and homeschooling gone, my autism diagnosis set off a massive identity crisis, followed by the realization that my entire way of living had to change, followed by a toxic explosion of internalized disabilism. Whatever the reason, I feel no self-worth at all. I do a beautiful job repairing a quilt, and all I can see are the imperfections in my work. I knit my husband a sweater from the Icelandic wool he spun himself, and all I can see are all the mistakes I made. Everyone in creation is telling my husband what a wonderful sweater he’s wearing, and it has no impact on me at all. People tell me how much they like my writing, and it doesn’t penetrate the dense fog I’m living in.

It’s gotten me questioning how one builds self-worth in the first place. I mean, did I ever have self-worth, or did I just do a lot of things that convinced me I did? Having a job and being a homeschooling mother are both wonderful, but they were always going to end; therefore, I based my self-esteem on impermanent things. That seems like a dangerous move from where I sit right now.

I used to have a decent sense of myself because I always felt that I could fake it well enough to get by. I could make pleasant conversation; I could go to soccer games and act like I belonged; I could chat it up with the neighbors about anything and everything. But working hard to fake it no longer applies. I walk around with a headset and don’t speak or hear very much at all in the outside world. Pretending to be normal basically went up in smoke once I realized that I had to wear a device in public that most people use when mowing the lawn.

Worse yet, my conversations with my therapist seem to be having a negative impact on me. For instance, last week, I told him that I feel like I need to stop talking entirely when I’m out in the world. He kept saying that perhaps it wasn’t all that black and white, that I could be more moderate, check in with myself, and talk more when I wanted, and less when I didn’t. What he doesn’t understand is that for me, moderation and autism do not mix. Moderation can only apply when one has a fairly moderate experience of the world. When one’s experience of the world is extreme and intense, a moderate solution can be worse than none at all.

I’m not sure that my therapist realizes that the minute I open my mouth, I’m already in way over my head. I crave communication. I want to keep talking. So much. But I’m playing catchup with everyone. I’m always a few clicks behind the conversation, and I have to make a tremendous effort to follow what people are saying. When it comes time to speak, I have to call on resources I don’t often have. Plus, I am so used to working hard at speaking that I forget that I’m actually working hard at speaking. It’s always a strain, but the strain is so familiar that I don’t even notice something is wrong until it’s way too late and everything in my body hurts.

I know that my therapist is responding to my upset about my social isolation and trying to come up with solutions, but I don’t need solutions. Unless I happen to run into a dozen autistic people in my local community, my social isolation will remain. So perhaps a better strategy would be to talk about how to handle the seriousness of my disabilities and their consequences for my life. I will never be able to walk through the world as a hearing person. I will never be able to have a relaxed conversation out in public. I will never be able to pass for normal again. I would like some help dealing emotionally with the gravity of the situation, not all kinds of ideas about moderation that simply cannot work for me.

Some years ago, I ran across a book called Shambhala: The Sacred Path of the Warrior by Chogyam Trungpa. The author writes about the spiritual warrior in a way that describes the impulses and demands of my autistic experience. I was drawn to the following words even before I knew about my autism:

“[The spiritual warrior] has no room and no desire to manipulate situations. He is able to be, quite fearlessly, what he is.

[P]aradoxically, the warrior finds himself more alone. He is like an island sitting alone in the middle of a lake. Occasional ferry boats and commuters go back and forth between the shore and the island, but all that activity only expresses the further loneliness, or aloneness, of the island. Although the warrior’s life is dedicated to helping others, he realizes that he will never be able to completely share his experience with others. The fullness of his experience is his own, and he must live with his own truth. Yet he is more and more in love with the world. That combination of love affair and loneliness is what enables the warrior to constantly reach out to help others. By renouncing his private world, the warrior discovers a greater universe and a fuller and fuller broken heart. This is not something to feel bad about: it is a cause for rejoicing. It is entering the warrior’s world.”

I’m not sure I’m ready to rejoice.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I’ve been very gratified by how excited and supportive people have been about the new name for my blog and my reasons for choosing it. Apparently, a number of others feel as I do about wanting to distance themselves from anyone using the Asperger’s label in an elitist way.

For me, dropping the Asperger’s label is the right decision. It’s been a long time coming, and I feel liberated by letting go of the pretense that I am anything other than autistic. But the process of coming to terms with who we are, especially for those of us who discover that we are autistic in mid-life, is complex and personal. I would never judge the process of a fellow autistic who is trying to carve out his or her path. For many autistic people, the word Aspie feels absolutely right, and I would never want to take that good feeling away. So, I want to be very clear: I don’t have an issue with anyone who self-identifies as an Aspie or uses the Asperger’s label, so long as the person is not being elitist, divisive, or dismissive of anyone on the spectrum. If someone self-identifies as an Aspie, and wants to be called an Aspie, I will respect that choice.

Remember: The DSM criteria do not even come close to describing the experience of being autistic. Not even close. Not even in the ballpark. Not even in the same country. And I’m talking about the criteria proposed for the DSM-V as well as those already in the DSM-IV. They are so far off the track, it’s ridiculous.

So I don’t want to put too much energy into arguing over labels. I want to do what I’ve always done with this blog: to talk about the experience of autism from the inside, to give and receive support, and to discuss the joys, challenges, difficulties, and gifts that come with being autistic.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I’m tired of the Asperger’s label.

I’m tired of people using it to distance themselves from other autistic people.

I’m tired of the folks who imply that having Asperger’s makes being autistic okay, but that being autistic is somehow not okay.

I’m tired of being put into some sort of nonsensical order in which Aspies rate higher than other autistics.

I’m tired of division.

I’m tired of hierarchy.

Bev’s latest post says it all for me. And by changing the name of her blog, she’s inspired me to do the same.

At some point, I hope to change my domain name as well. I haven’t figured out the mechanics of using a new domain name and making sure you all can find me there, but when I do, I’ll make the change.

UPDATE: If you’ve found the new URL, you’ll see that I’ve changed my domain name. I’ve specified the proper settings to redirect people automatically from aspergerjourneys.com, but it may take up to 72 hours for the settings to take effect. Argh. Meanwhile, I’ll need to go through and repost all my photos again, since they’re attached to my old domain name.

Note that I also have a new email address: rachel@journeyswithautism.com.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I went to New York City with Bob for three days last week, and I made a new friend. I know you already know one another (fairly well, in fact), but you’ve never been formally introduced. Kindly forgive the social faux pas, which I will now graciously remedy:

Blog readers, meet My Eccentricity. My Eccentricity, meet my blog readers. My Eccentricity has been around for awhile (as long as I can remember, in fact), but we’ve only recently become close friends. It’s amazing what a trip to New York City will do for you.

And how did I happen to end up in New York City for three days when I frequently quail at the prospect of going grocery shopping in our quaint little New England backwater? It was love. Of course! Read on.

The Incentive: I was tired of being away from Bob for three days every other week. He was tired of being away from me for three days every other week. Spending time with his dad is an imperative for Bob, so the idea of cutting back on these visits never occurred to either of us. The only way to get more time together was for me to get in the car and go to New York City.

The Drive to New York City: It had been about a year and a half since Bob and I had made the four-hour drive to New York together, and I had missed those times. It’s always been great to go for a long drive and have time to talk, joke, and just be together. So, although the drive was completely overstimulating to my poor Aspie nervous system, I made it to the hotel without getting a migraine. The fact that we took the Merritt Parkway, on which no trucks are allowed, went a long way toward keeping my stress at a reasonable level.

The Hotel: The room was nice, the employees were friendly, and best of all, I didn’t leave the place from the moment we checked in until the moment we checked out. Now, it may seem that going to Manhattan and staying indoors was a waste of time, but I assure you, it was not. The sensory minefield of the drive was sufficient for a first outing, thank you, so I decided to make the best of my time at the hotel. I finished incorporating all the review comments into my book, I caught up on my ASL homework, and I made great strides on a sweater I’m knitting for Bob. Plus, the hotel had an awesome fitness room, and I was the only person in it for over two hours. I actually found a way to have solitude in New York City! I should write a book.

And did I mention that Tuesday was our seventh wedding anniversary? It was! So, we ordered in dinner from room service, chose a movie to watch, and…that’s as much as I’m going to say.

The Impact of the World at Large: During the time that we were in New York, the people of Massachusetts made a terribly asinine an ill-advised decision and decided to honor the memory of Ted Kennedy by electing a man who ran on a platform of derailing healthcare reform in the Senate. And what was worse: Every time I went onto the Comcast website to retrieve my email, I had to see a headline about it. Arghh. So, although I knew that I couldn’t cure the insanity overturn the will of the people of Massachusetts, I could do a couple of things to make myself feel better: a) go on a news fast and b) install a desktop email client so that I never have to use Comcast webmail again EVER. I did both. More on how I dealt with the healthcare debacle later on.

The Drive Back to Vermont: After three days, we were very ready to go home. So, while Bob walked to the parking garage to get the car, I ensconced myself on a sofa in the hotel lobby—a sofa that was so big that when I sat all the way back, my feet dangled over the edge of the cushions. I felt like a little kid in a room full of grownups—kind of how I feel all the time, except that this time, I felt very cute. The lobby also got noisy, so it was a relief to get in the car and head back to our quiet lives in Vermont. We left in sunlight and arrived home just as it was getting dark.

My Healthcare Reform Rant: By the time we got home, I was a wee bit very much on the overstimulated side. I was talking a blue streak, bouncing off the walls, unpacking like it was the last thing I’d ever do, and feeling really, really happy and energetic for the first time in a long time. I hadn’t been depressed exactly, but protecting myself from the possibility of overload had left me feeling isolated, and the trip to New York had made me feel like part of the world again. I finally realized (duh) that I don’t have to conform to anything (duh) except the laws of wherever I happen to be (duh), and that I can indulge my eccentricity any old way I please (duh), especially (duh) in the comfort of my own home.

So, because I was royally pissed off by the whole disaster in Massachusetts, I decided to expend some of my rather impressive store of nervous energy by indulging in the following rant:

“What the HELL were people thinking? How can they NOT know how badly this country needs healthcare reform? Are they crazy? What the hell happened?

Oh, I know. They let children vote in Massachusetts. Children. Well, actually, people of legal age with the mental acuity and social consciousness of children.

But wait. That’s an insult to little kids. In fact, I can’t compare these people to anyone, because they’re being so mind-numbingly ridiculous that any comparison to any other group of people would be unfair. I mean, how do you describe people who think that if they get sick, their insurance company is going to cover the costs? And not raise their premiums? Hahahahahahahaha! What planet are these people on?

And how the HELL did Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat end up in the hands of a person whose only aim in life (apart from looking perpetually young) is to derail healthcare reform? I mean, do people have ANY respect for Ted Kennedy’s legacy, for the way he supported the working person, for the passion he felt about healthcare reform? HELLO? ANYONE? Holy shit. I hope they issue an alert for the area around Arlington National Cemetery, because right now, Ted Kennedy is SPINNING in his grave at such a high velocity that his burial place is sure to become the epicenter of a MASSIVE EARTHQUAKE. Maybe then, all those folks in Congress will WAKE UP to the need for universal health care.

But wait! They already have universal health care. Paid for by the US government! Oh. My. God. It’s socialized healthcare. For Republicans. Can the hypocrisy get any worse?

Yes, it can. The Democrats in Massachusetts can blame everyone and everything for their defeat, but last time I looked, Martha Coakley, the freakin’ attorney general of the state, never even ran a freakin’ campaign. What was she THINKING? That the ghost of Ted Kennedy was going to anoint her the Senator from Massachusetts?

Martha, honey. It doesn’t work like that. DUH!! How can you be the attorney general of the state and NOT KNOW THAT???”

I felt better.

The Day After: I went to work at the thrift store. I was friendly. I made conversation. I extended myself. I brought home a quilt to repair. I was still pretty buzzed.

The Day After That: Bob and I discussed how much fun I am when I’m feeling energetic and inspired. And why people with autism so often get diagnosed as bi-polar. And how I really am fine the way I am, however I’m feeling. And that I don’t need to ask the world’s permission to be myself.

And Now? No crash and burn. At all. Just some tiredness and a sense of relaxation. Amazing, eh?

That’s what happens when I go out into the world and stop worrying about what people think of me.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

The first time I heard the term disabilism, I winced and rolled my eyes. It’s not that I’m against the use of “-ism”s to describe bigotry. There’s enough bigotry in the world to justify a whole dictionary full of “-ism”s. My problem was more basic: I didn’t believe that disabilism existed. After all, who hates disabled people?

Duh.

Because I live in a culture that teaches fear and loathing of difference, I’ve imbibed all the poison the society has to offer—racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, misogyny, anti-Semitism, you name it. Knowing that I’ve internalized all of this hatred and fear, I’ve spent the better part of my adult life trying to root out as much as I can, secure in the knowledge that I will never fully succeed.

Until I had to deal with the fact that I am a disabled person, it had never occurred to me that I had any kind of bigotry against disabled people at all. In fact, I have a very vivid memory of the day in Berkeley that a young man in a wheelchair called me over and asked me to drain his urine bag into the street. I was happy to do it, and he seemed to have no self-consciousness about it at all. Perhaps he sensed my innocence and knew that I would be nice. I don’t know. All I know is that it’s one of my best memories.

But why would I remember that moment? Well, it made me feel good about myself. It made me feel helpful. It made me feel compassionate. Okay. Are any of those feelings a problem? It depends on what lies beneath them. For me, they were based on a subtext of “Oh, this poor man has to actually ask a stranger to empty his urine bag. On a public street.” The fact that he was gracious, self-respecting, and without shame does not take away from the fact that I thought of him with pity, and I that I felt lucky that I wasn’t him.

If you asked me what I felt when I saw a person in a wheelchair, I’d inevitably say, “Oh, that must be so hard for him.” Or if you asked me about a person who was Deaf, I’d probably say, “Oh, it must be awful not to be able to hear Beethoven.” It didn’t matter what the situation. I felt sorry for people who weren’t able-bodied in the way that our society defines it. Of course, I never thought I was being bigoted, because one of my best friends was in a wheelchair, and as we all know, if one of your best friends is….well, you know.

What does it mean to feel sorry for disabled people? What does it mean that I was glad not to be one of them? What does it mean that my first thought wasn’t about the person, but about how hard, how limited, how sad, how embarrassing, how terrible that person’s life must be? Is that really bigotry?

I think it is. My reactions were based on a stereotype of what a disabled person must be feeling, of what a disabled person must be thinking, and of what a disabled person’s life must be like. What’s missing from all of these moments is something as necessary to human existence as clean air and water. It’s called respect. Respect and pity do not go hand in hand. Respect and feeling sorry for someone do not go hand in hand. Respect and thanking God you’re not like that poor schmuck over there do not go hand in hand. Respect only goes hand in hand with full acceptance, with encouragement, with love for the individual, and with justice. Respect powers life forward. It doesn’t leave it hanging in mid-air while you wring your hands and think, “Oh, I’m so glad I’m not you.”

When I check out my attitude toward myself, I nearly choke on what a toxin disabilism really is. Lately, I’ve finally given in and begun using the “disabled” label to describe myself, as in “I am disabled in the culture in which I live, because the culture does not cultivate my strengths, support my needs, or respect my existence. And just for the record, being disabled does not mean that I’m disordered, broken, or impaired.” Why go through all of these words? Why explain it? Why be so defensive? Why not just say “I’m disabled” and get over it? Why do I feel saying that I’m disabled is “giving in” to some sort of adversary?

Because  in some of the deepest places in my being, those places in which the light of rationality and the balm of compassion have not yet entered, I think I’m pathetic. I feel ashamed. I feel broken. I’m one of those people over there: the ones who are always too loud, or walk funny, or talk funny, or look funny, or drool, or make weird sounds, or don’t get what’s going on. They’re the people I used to feel sorry for all those years when I thought I was being compassionate and accepting and helpful. Now I am one of them. Oh. My. God. Now I have to cross the line and say, “Yes, I’ve faked it really well all my life, and now, the facade is gone, and I am who I’ve always been.” I’ve always been autistic. I’ve always been disabled. I’ve always faked my way through everything and wondered why I hated myself so badly in the process.

When the culture tells you that being disabled means that your life isn’t worth as much as the next person’s life, that message tends to engender self hatred. When people talk about a cure for autism, what they’re really saying is that somehow, if you took away the autism, you’d get a person whose life was actually worth something. Well, excuse me, but the last time I looked, I’m the only one who can decide whether my life is worth something. I live in a world that makes it hard for me to believe sometimes, but that doesn’t make it so. Not by a long shot.

As I write these words, I’m aware that I’m making a major shift. I’ve gone from feeling dispirited about everything I can’t do to simply looking at the internalized, cultural messages that impede my ability to feel worthy of love and respect. I call that progress. In fact, in the life of this disabled person, it’s a major leap forward.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

In my last post, I discussed my commitment to move ahead with my life in the knowledge that I have no extended family. That reality is still very clear to me, and I got a very vivid reminder of it last night.

As you might have noticed, I have a rather large extended (former) family, with many, many cousins. At this moment, I’m turning my attention to a cousin I’ll call Boris. I haven’t seen Boris in 30 years or more. I never knew her well, but over time, a couple of people in the family made remarks to the effect that she might have been abused as a child. As cousin Ralph might point out, I have no way of knowing one way or the other. Boris herself has never said anything about it. If she did, I would believe her, but we’re never going to get anywhere close to that conversation.

Read on for details.

After I had scattered the ashes of my hope for an extended family, my conscience started to bother me about Boris. What if she were another survivor? What if she thinks she’s the only one? It didn’t feel right to simply go away without saying something to her, but what should I say? I stewed on it for awhile, and I finally realized that all I needed to do was to give her my contact information, in case she ever wanted to get in touch with me. (Please stop groaning.) So, I sent her a message that was as benign and as neutral as I could possibly make it:

“Hi, I’m your cousin…I now go by my Hebrew name of Rachel, and I’m married. If you ever want to contact me, you can reach me at rachel.vermont@comcast.net.

I hope that all is well with you.
Rachel”

I knew that the family lie had made it to the outermost reaches of my (former) family, so I knew it was entirely possible that the lie had made it to her door. I felt good in my heart for having done the ethical thing, and that was all that mattered to me. And so, I was prepared for her to ignore me, or to simply say “Fuck off.”

But no. Nothing is that easy in my (former) family. I’ll paraphrase Boris’ response. She said:

1. She doesn’t have a cousin anymore.
2. Her losing me as a cousin was my choice.
3. I have to live with my choice, so go to hell.
4. If I ever contacted her or any member of her family again, she would seek out a civil harassment restraining order.

I will never have to get all “Aspie-and-wordy” again to describe the toxic nature of my original family system. You have the whole family dynamic in a nutshell, right here: shunning, blaming, distortions, lack of compassion, and unprovoked threats. There it is. All on a platter, along with my head.

And why? Because I offered someone I barely know my email address and said I hoped she was well.

Okey dokey.

So, then I got to talking with Bob and with a good Aspie friend of mine about this latest turn of events, and I suddenly realized that I was being bullied. Moi, bullied? I thought. Moi, with a blue belt in karate? Moi, with 25 years of therapy under my belt? Moi, the mama bear who has been known to risk reputation and throw social graces to the wind on behalf of her (now nearly grown) little cub? Yes, I’m afraid so.

And then, I thought, wow, that’s exactly what happened with my parents and with my brother. They bullied me. My father bullied me with physical pain, with unwanted touch, and with threats of harm. My mother bullied me with lies, ridicule, and manipulation. My brother once pinned me to a car because I disagreed with something he said, and he shunned me when I broke contact with my parents. And then there was Uncle Sylvia, and our disastrous conversation of three years ago, in which he ridiculed me for asking for love and compassion over what I had suffered. And come to think of it, every single family member who has heard the lies about me and believed them has been bullying me with their silence and their rejection ever since. It’s absolutely amazing to finally realize it.

All this bullying, all directed at me. Innocent, good-hearted, clueless, Aspie me. But why? I have a few ideas. (Feel free to add your own).

1. I walk into every room thinking that people are all set to receive love, attention, and goodness from me. I just have to be clear and non-threatening, and we’ll all get along, right? What could be simpler? Ha ha. It’s not bad to want to be loving and attentive, but the expression “pearls before swine” keeps coming to mind.

2. I am very childlike. I have a kind of innocence that all the abuse in the world has never been able to take away from me. So, I figure that people feel powerful bullying an innocent person. Or something. I have no idea. It’s just a guess.

3. For much of my life, I tried so eagerly, so earnestly, and so innocently to figure out the rules and play by them that people began to see me as defenseless. And, as a kid, I was defenseless, just as any other kid. But for me, there was an extra element of defenselessness, because little autistic me could not understand lying, cruelty, social rules, and social hierarchies. I just kept trying to make sense of them and be everyone’s friend. That made me more than a little vulnerable.

4. Despite my once-unquenchable desire to figure out the rules, fit in, and be normal, I have always been the Achilles heel of the family. Why? I’m an Aspie. I speak the truth. I break illusions. As such, I am the person who is the ever-present reminder that the family ain’t nearly as perfect as everyone would like to pretend it is.

5. I am the person who left the bullies behind. A dysfunctional family system cannot tolerate people leaving just on account of they’d rather not be bullied.

So, I reach out to someone genetically related to me, on the off chance that she might need it, just to feel that I’ve done the right thing, and the whole family system comes roaring right at me.

God, I’m having a serious autism moment. The gig has been up for a long time, and I’m the last to know.

Comments and hugs both appreciated.

© 2010 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

The very idea that autism appears in any book called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is deeply offensive to me. When I venture in and try to make sense of the current split between the diagnostic criteria for Asperger’s and autism, all I can see is that it places autistic people into hierarchies that make no logical or practical sense.

Because this whole subject is really bothering me, I thought it might be fun to rewrite the diagnostic criteria, line by line, so that the text describes us as something more than walking collections of mysterious pathologies. In my rewrite, I have maintained each line of the diagnostic criteria with a strikethrough, followed by my proposed changes. Because the people who wrote the diagnostic criteria reused some of the same text, but didn’t bother to create a consistent numbering scheme, I couldn’t combine the criteria for Asperger’s and autism without adding more illogic to the situation. In a perfect world, people would check their writing for logical consistency before they publish it. Since they didn’t, my rewrite consists of two parts.

Part One
How to Tell Whether Someone is an Asperger’s Awe-tistic
Diagnostic Criteria for 299.80 Asperger’s Disorder

(I) Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:
(I) An unusual mode of social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:

(A) marked impairments in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body posture, and gestures to regulate social interaction
(A) An acute sensory and empathic sensitivity that i) makes eye contact and social interaction intensely difficult and ii) results in the rejection of ambiguous nonverbal behaviors in favor of direct, detailed, and honest speech.

(B) failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level
(B) Beginning in early childhood, a gift for developing relationships with people of widely different ages and developmental trajectories.

(C) a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interest or achievements with other people, (e.g.. by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people)
(C) The understanding, gained uncannily early in life, that i) most people will not appreciate the awe-tist’s interests or achievements, and ii) showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest will be met with judgment and/or hostility that manifest in socially acceptable forms of repression (such as social exclusion) or criminal acts (such as physical assault).

(D) lack of social or emotional reciprocity
(D) An acute sensitivity to the feelings of others that causes the awe-tist to refrain from using banal pleasantries or empty words that may hurt or offend.

(E) An altogether eccentric form of social and emotional reciprocity that insists upon fairness, directness, sensitivity, tolerance, substance, acceptance of difference, and mutually interesting subject matter.

(II) Restricted repetitive & stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:
(II) Specialized, disciplined, and brilliantly useful patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:

(A) encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus
(A) A passion for one or more specialized subjects extraordinary in intensity and focus.

(B) apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals
(B) An innate capacity for self-care that manifests itself in the creation of comforting routines and a fascination with patterns of all kinds.

(C) stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g. hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)
(C) An innate capacity for sensory self-regulation by means of various stims, which can encompass such soothing activities as joint compression, touching the comforting texture of soft fabrics, watching spinning objects, and so forth.

(D) persistent preoccupation with parts of objects
(D) An exceptional ability to work with objects in an unconventional fashion.

(III) The disturbance causes clinically significant impairments in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
(III) Because the world is not yet attuned to the acute sensitivities and extraordinary gifts of awe-tistic people, being awe-tistic can result in social ostracism, occupational dead-ends, and other disappointing outcomes. For the lives of awe-tistic people to improve, early educational and social intervention in the lives of neuro-typical people is recommended.

(IV) There is no clinically significant general delay in language (E.G. single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years)
(IV) Whether you started talking at two years old or four years old, does it really matter?

(V) There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of age-appropriate self help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction) and curiosity about the environment in childhood.
(V) We are certain that in a different time and culture, awe-tistic people would have places of honor as shamans, dreamers, healers, artists, builders, and trusted confidantes.

(VI) Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia.
(VI) The person’s awe-tistic consciousness is not better accounted for by some other type of hierarchical hair-splitting that results in diagnosing life itself as a kind of disease.

Part Two
How to Tell Whether Someone is Awe-tistic, Period
Diagnostic Criteria for 299.00 Autistic Disorder

(I) A total of six (or more) items from (A), (B), and (C), with at least two from (A), and one each from (B) and (C):

(A) qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:
(A) An unusual mode of social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:

(1) marked impairments in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body posture, and gestures to regulate social interaction
(1) A lack of reliance on the use of ambiguous nonverbal behaviors.

(2) failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level
(2) A love of solitude and solitary play.

(3) a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interest or achievements with other people, (e.g.. by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people)
(3) The understanding, gained uncannily early in life, that i) most people will not appreciate the awe-tist’s interests or achievements, and that ii) showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest will be met with judgment and/or hostility that can manifest in socially accepted forms of repression (such as social exclusion) or criminal acts (such as physical assault).

(4) lack of social or emotional reciprocity
(4) An acute sensitivity to the feelings of others that causes the awe-tist to refrain from using banal pleasantries or empty words that may hurt or offend.

(5) An altogether eccentric form of social and emotional reciprocity that insists upon fairness, directness, sensitivity, tolerance, substance, acceptance of difference, and mutually interesting subject matter.

(B) qualitative impairments in communication as manifested by at least one of the following:
(B) qualitative differences in thought and perception as manifested by at least one of the following:

1. delay in, or total lack of, the development of spoken language (not accompanied by an attempt to compensate through alternative modes of communication such as gesture or mime)
1. Visual and associative thought patterns that the awe-tist has difficulty translating into the more restrictive medium of verbal language.

2. in individuals with adequate speech, marked impairment in the ability to initiate or sustain a conversation with others
2. An acute sensory and empathic sensitivity that makes spending extensive periods of time with people intensely difficult.

3. stereotyped and repetitive use of language or idiosyncratic language
3. An effort to use language despite the tremendous challenge of transitioning between visual/associative thinking and verbal/linear expression.

4. lack of varied, spontaneous make-believe play or social imitative play appropriate to developmental level
4. The development of all kinds of unique, idiosyncratic, and interesting ways to spend one’s time.

(C) restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities, as manifested by at least two of the following:
(C) Specialized, disciplined, and brilliantly useful patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least two of the following:

(1) encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus
(1) A passion for one or more specialized subjects extraordinary in intensity and focus.

(2) apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals
(2) An innate capacity for self-care that manifests itself in the creation of comforting routines and a fascination with patterns of all kinds.

(3) stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g. hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)
(3) An innate capacity for sensory self-regulation by means of various stims, which can encompass such soothing activities as joint compression, touching the comforting texture of soft fabrics, watching spinning objects, and other similarly enjoyable activities.

(4) persistent preoccupation with parts of objects
(4) An exceptional ability to work with objects in an unconventional fashion.

(II) Delays or abnormal functioning in at least one of the following areas, with onset prior to age 3 years:

(A) social interaction
(B) language as used in social communication
(C) symbolic or imaginative play

(II) Because awe-tistic people often see the world in unusual ways, the difficulty of translating awe-tistic consciousness into the more restrictive medium of verbal language may result in the pathologizing of awe-tistic social interaction, language development, and play.

(III) The disturbance is not better accounted for by Rett’s Disorder or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder
(III) The person’s awe-tistic consciousness is not better accounted for by some other type of hierarchical hair-splitting that results in life itself becoming a kind of disease. 

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

I’ve been pondering the fact that while neuro-typicality is considered “normal,” autism is considered a medical condition. This lack of balance bothers my autistic soul, which craves symmetry, integrity, and basic fairness.

Perhaps, at some future date, autism will be removed from the DSM, much as homosexuality was entirely stricken from its pages in 1986. I don’t expect to see this development in my lifetime. The scare tactics of organizations like Autism Speaks; the ways in which scientific researchers have appropriated our voices; the fact that we are the subjects of medical and psychological “research” to find “treatments” and even a “cure”; the propensity of so many people to define only one way of thinking and believing as “normal”— all these factors mean that the struggle for respect and empowerment will be a long and difficult one.

Even before I knew that I was autistic, though, I got the message that something was “wrong” with me. Whatever it was, it had to be “fixed,” preferably with the help of medical professionals. I’ve defined the problem in a number of different ways over the course of my lifetime: insecurity, self-loathing, difficulties with trust, anxiety, depression, loneliness, failure to find “community,” a relentless inability to sit down and shut up when told to do so, a tendency to go on and on and on about the topics I’m passionate about, and anger at things that other people just shrug off. After nearly every conversation I’ve ever had with anyone, anywhere, I’ve thought, “Did I do that right? I hope so. I’d better replay the whole thing and make sure I wasn’t too much of an idiot.” I knew that while other people were going home and thinking about what a nice time they’d had, I was obsessing about whether I’d screwed up.

Well, my dear friends, I am happy to tell you that the idea that I’m broken is on its way out. I can’t say that it’s gone entirely, or that it won’t re-emerge at a later time, but today, right now, I know that I am so much better than fine. I know that I have a gift—the gift of being autistic. In another culture, at another place and time, I might have been honored for this gift, and I might have been given wise counsel for where this gift might lead me. As it is, I’ve had to stumble along until I just couldn’t stomach the idea that I’m broken anymore. And then, a new world began opening up to me.

I first noticed it happening when my ASL tutor came over a couple of weeks back. She is an artist, and she teaches art at the school for the Deaf. She was born with tinnitus in both ears, so she can hear and speak, but it’s quite difficult for her in many of the same ways it’s difficult for me. She doesn’t like being around crowds of people, because it’s hard for her to pick out what people are saying. So, using a combination of signing and speaking, we got to chatting about a number of things, including art, and I invited her to take a little tour of my house. We have a lot of artwork in this house—not just mine, but paintings by Bob’s grandfather and grandmother, some Ethiopian embroideries, my daughter’s photography, and a number of old ancestor photos. My tutor really loved looking at all the artwork, and she was so direct, so honest, and so enthusiastic in her responses that I felt even more comfortable with her than I had before. The similar ways that we process sound and speech seem to lead to a similar need for directness and friendliness. It’s as though we both know there is little time to waste with anything else.

Then, I got together last Sunday with my new Aspie friend who lives nearby. I was thinking that we’d spend two hours together at the most, but the afternoon just kept on going and going. When I got home 3 ½ hours later, I was tired, but not “strung-out-and-running-on-fumes” tired. I got home and thought about what a nice time I’d had, just like a regular person.

How did this happen? Well, first of all, I knew that my friend thinks as I do: associatively and intuitively, rather than linearly and analytically. It’s not that we can’t get all linear and analytical; we can, and we do. But before we get there, we’re free associating and intuiting connections all over the place, and it’s great fun. That day, being in the presence of someone else whose thought patterns are like mine took away a great deal of social anxiety. I knew that I could just relax and let my mind do what it does. So, for example, when I had a story to tell, my friend gave me plenty of room to tell it. Sure, I repeated myself, and made leaps of logic, and went down some little incidental and tangential byways, but it was all okay. And when she spoke, she did the same things, and I gave her plenty of space to express herself. Can you say “social reciprocity”? And the best part was that, as a speaker and as a listener, I didn’t feel compelled to follow any kind of linear logic, because we were engaging in a different kind of logic altogether. What a relief! It’s so tiring to try to follow most conversations because their form is so alien to the way that my mind works.

Needless to say, it felt perfectly okay to engage in apparent non-sequiturs that day, knowing that my friend understood that these non-sequiturs were simply the result of the way I think, and did not signal disrespect or lack of interest in what she was saying. So, at one point, we were looking at the fun stuff on her refrigerator, and the next moment, I turned into the living room and started (metaphorically) tripping on this very cool table she had placed by the window. It went something like this: “Your boyfriend seems like a wonderful person, and I love the Halloween costume he’s wearing in this picture and…WOW! Look at that table! I love it. It’s got a place under it to hang glasses, and a cloth holder below for wine bottles, and…Wow! I just love such compact, multi-purpose stuff, you know?” Did she look at me like I was crazy? No. She showed me the hidden place for the ice bucket.

My new friend is also the person who recommended that I read The Cosmic Serpent by Jeremy Narby, a book that has broken open my visual thinking and my love of texture, pattern, color, and image. Suddenly, I’m making art nearly every day. Do most people do that? No. Does that mean there’s something wrong with it? Of course not.

My ability to engage the world associatively, visually, intuitively, and empathically is a great gift. My passion for balance and for justice is a great gift. My ability to enjoy solitude is a great gift. My ability to create things of beauty is a great gift. The intensity with which I feel things, hear things, and see things is a great gift.

None of these gifts are easy. Having a gift does not necessarily make life fun. In fact, having a gift and not knowing how to use it can make the world a cold and lonely place. Most of us live in a culture that pathologizes our way of being, rather than giving us support for using our gifts. Many of us wander in the wilderness for most of our lives, wondering where the hell it is we’re going. It isn’t fun, but having fun is not the same as knowing joy. Sometimes, finding joy is hard work and takes a lifetime of wandering. But to be able to value one’s own gifts, on their own terms, without reference to an arbitrary idea of “normal,” is the beginning of joy.

There are times that I feel so changed that I don’t recognize myself. Who is this person making art with a high-temperature glue gun and pieces of an old camera? Who is this person who has suddenly discovered that hand-stitching a quilt is a calming and centering practice? Who is this person who thinks associatively, and rambles on, and knows that far from something being wrong with her, something is very right with her?

It’s me. I’m an autistic person who has finally figured out that I don’t need to change. I just need to be.

© 2009 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg